1st International Conference: Renewable Energy - Small Hydro
3-7 Feb 1997, Hyderabad, India
THE DEVELOPMENT OF TRADITIONAL HIMALAYAN WATERMILLS FOR SUSTAINABLE VILLAGE-SCALE MICRO-HYDROPOWER.
O.Paish, IT Power Ltd, The Warren, Bramshill Road, Eversley, Hants, RG27 0PR, UK
R.Armstrong-Evans, Evans Engineering Ltd, Trecarrell Mill, Trebullett, Launceston, Cornwall, UK
R.Saini, Alternate Hydro Energy Centre, Roorkee University, Roorkee - 247667
D.Singh, T.E.R.I, Darbari Seth Block, India Habitat Centre, Lodi Rd, New Delhi - 110 003
D.Kedia, Industrial Consultants, GS Road, Bhanga Garh, Guwahati - 781005
ABSTRACT
The Watermills Block of the Hilly Hydro Project has set out to demonstrate technologies for upgrading and replacing some of the many thousands of traditional watermills, or gharats, in the Himalayan regions of India.
The paper covers:
1. Introduction
1.1 The Hilly Hydro Project
The UNDP-GEF Hilly Hydro Project is an ongoing initiative supported by the World Bank Global Environment Facility and the Government of India to demonstrate and promote the use of small-scale hydropower in the 13 Himalayan states of India.
The principal existing
use of hydropower in the Himalayas is through the use of
traditional wooden vertical-axis watermills
(gharats)
for grinding grain. These operate off 2-6m head, developing
typically 0.5kW. There are believed to be up to 200,000 mills in
the Indian Himalayas, a further 25,000 in Nepal, and many more in
Pakistan, China, Afghanistan, Myanmar and parts of Turkey. This
indigenous technology is built and maintained by the miller
himself using local materials. However in recent years, gharats
have started to fall into disuse: owners have descended to the
plains to seek more lucrative employment, more effective diesel
powered mills in nearby towns have reduced their market, and
major deforestation has caused some water supplies to disappear.
Yet, if this abundant and renewable waterpower resource could be
exploited more effectively with appropriate and modernised
equipment, it could play a key role in driving sustainable
economic development in the hilly regions. This is the task which
the India Hilly Hydro Project is now endeavouring to address.
The Watermills component of the project is seeking to upgrade and develop 100 watermills in different regions with improved technology which will serve as prototypes for upgrading the remaining watermills in the region. The upgrades will cover two different types of development:
1.2 Background
1.2.1 The Himalayas
The populations of the
Himalayas, from Afghanistan to Myanmar, still live predominantly
in agricultural economies, often at subsistence level. The market
for milling is reasonably well served by traditional watermills
spread throughout the region, but most other essential
agro-processing services (rice-hulling, oil-expelling,
juice-extraction, etc.) are non-existent and have to be done
manually (ie. by women), or by many hours walk to electric
or diesel machines in town. In Manipur, an alternative waterpower
technology has been identified: the Pani Dhenki, a
drop-hammer used for de-husking rice.
1.2.2 Beneficiaries
Improving traditional
watermills is intended to benefit :
1.2.3 Traditional
technology
It is important to note the advantages inherent in the indigenous
watermill technology, in particular it is:
At the other extreme, a state-of-art mini-hydro plant may be able to increase the useful energy output at a watermill site by several times, but will inevitably involve:
Such modern installations can prove to be unsustainable in the longer-term without accompanying advances in local and regional infrastructure, local skills and engineering facilities, and major technology transfer initiatives. For example, once the crossflow (Banki) turbine had been proven and demonstrated by Swiss engineers in Nepal, it took 7 further years of concentrated promotional activities to establish a workable level of dissemination [1].
A sustainable approach to developing and transferring appropriate technology therefore implies a compromise strategy, where modern know-how (eg. on hydraulics and turbine technology) is applied in the local context. This approach, adopted from the start by the Watermills Block [2], encourages local manufacture and support of the technology, and designs that are simple both in concept and in construction.
1.2.4 Nepal
experience
Nepal is the only country where significant progress has been
made to upgrade watermill designs, where developments occurred in
2 phases. Initially a packaged steel assembly was developed by a
local workshop which incorporated a vertical-axis impulse turbine
made with fabricated steel buckets and a penstock pipe [3]. This
became known as the MPPU (Multi-Purpose Power Unit) and in the
early 1980s this system outstripped the sales of crossflow
turbines being promoted through foreign aid programmes because of
its simplicity, its similarity in principal to the traditional
watermill, and its low cost [1]. When the manufacturer ceased
production of MPPUs to take up more profitable business, GTZ of
Germany supported a programme to develop a cheap
construction kit which involved supplying the MPPU
runner and a few components to enable millers to install upgrades
themselves [4]. This improved ghatta programme ran
from 1984-1988, with further support from 1991-1993, and there is
now a steady market for these kits of over 100 per year,
providing improved milling plus a rice-hulling option. GTZ
however recognise that there is scope for developing and
improving the technology, which still has a number of
limitations, in particular:
1.2.5 Indian
experience
There has been more than one attempt in India to copy and
disseminate the Nepali design of watermill upgrade [5] [6] but
these initiatives have failed to make a significant impact,
through either institutional reasons (highly subsidised, no
training or technical support, owners not helped to develop their
businesses), or technical reasons (designs were copied, not
understood and transferred, so systems were inappropriately
specified and installed).
2. Site & equipment surveys
2.1 Overview
In the first phase of the Watermills project, the team from IT Power, UK, the Alternate Hydro Energy Centre at Roorkee University, the Tata Energy Research Institute in Delhi, and Industrial Consultants, Guwahati, has completed numerous site surveys in the Northern and North-East states and studied the needs, capabilities and aspirations of mill-owners through both one-to-one interviews and an organised forum of mill-owners in March 1996. A standard questionnaire was developed for completing each survey. A census is also ongoing which is attempting to quantify the total number of gharats in the region and therefore the potential for implementing new technology.
A broad conclusion from the surveys has been that nearly all sites are technically feasible for upgrade machines to be installed, but the more critical questions in selecting a viable site are:
ie. the priority is less on finding the right sites, but more on identifying the right owners.
2.1.1 Case study -
Gadora Bridge
The Gharat Owners Association in Chamoli District (UP) have
nominated a site at Gadora Bridge for demonstrating a
multi-purpose system to replace the existing, traditional gharat.
The site is an attractive choice for a demonstration scheme since
it is directly by the roadside on the tourist route to
Bhadrinath, and the bridge is also a crossroads for local
movements. The miller is young and enthusiastic, and keen to
adopt changes if it is worth his while.
The existing gharat is one of 5 at Gadora Bridge, and one of 21 on this stretch of the river. It was therefore agreed by the Association that this gharat should be converted for uses other than milling, so as not to take business away from the other millers.
An available head of 8m and design flow of 150l/s implies a gross potential of 12kW, therefore a working capacity of around 6kW.
Discussions on possible end-uses concluded that the following activities might be feasible and profitable in the context of the businesses operating locally:
The existing mill-house would have to be demolished and replaced with a new building to accommodate the proposed end-use equipment plus café, and a small amount of work would have to be done on the channel. It was agreed that these civil works could be carried out by the Association.
2.1.2 Case Study -
Dehra Dun
Another typical example is a 1.5m head site near Dehra Dun in
Uttar Pradesh. The owner mills with a traditional watermill by
day, but also wants to generate electricity to be able to run a
jam-making business from the produce of his farm. He also wants
power for lighting, TV, and fan in the evenings and night. He has
a flow of 150 litres/sec and power potential of 2kW. He would be
keen to invest in improved hydropower technology, but has found
nothing available to meet his need. In this case the
millers requirements would be served by a modernised
gharat-type system which could still be used for milling, but
also adapted to allow an add-on generator to provide electrical
power.
2.2 Establishing Local Contacts
A further important issue during the 1st phase was the need to identify local organisations to support the technology at the local level and to take responsibility for managing and supporting new projects.
The Himalayan Environmental Studies and Conservation Organisation (HESCO), an Indian NGO based in Chamoli District, UP, was responsible for setting up the Gharat Owners Association in Chamoli and has been working with them to design and implement simple upgrades for traditional gharats. The improvements have involved lining the open chute with galvanised steel sheet, using a Teflon bush for the top-bearing (at the centre of the bed-stone), and using a fabricated ball-bearing assembly as the footstep bearing at the base of the rotor.
About 12 gharats have been upgraded to date in Chamoli District. The component and material costs are about 1500Rp and the upgrade work is undertaken by the miller himself. Increased output of 2-3 times has been experienced, with stone speed increasing typically from 70 to 120rpm.
2.2.1
Gharat-Owners Meeting
On 17th March 1996 a meeting of the Associations 30 members
was staged by HESCO. The meeting enabled the owners to express
their outlook on their current livelihoods, as follows:
2.3 End-use equipment survey
A brief survey was also carried out to establish the current costs and power ratings of end-use equipment relevant to the setting up of multi-purpose watermill upgrades. The following table summarises the general conclusions from a survey in Saharanpur (U.P.):
2.4 Technology needs
The general engineering strategy for upgrading the mills should be to establish the very best systems that can be coped with by the mill-owners. The needs and capabilities of the person who is going to install and operate the equipment should have as much bearing on the overall design as the hydraulic and engineering criteria.
It is proposed that there are two general approaches that can be applied successfully in the local context:
The danger lies in adopting a half-way solution which is both unreliable and too sophisticated for local expertise to repair. The need for sustainability would indicate that the designs for upgraded gharats should be maintainable locally (approach 1), and the multi-purpose units should be designed to be robust and maintenance-free (approach 2).
3. Design Issues
Because of the great diversity of the sites and the economic and personal preferences of the millers, the array of possible detailed design choices is large and there are virtually no areas which are totally clear regarding either the general approach or the precise selection of equipment.
Outline designs for the first demonstration units are proposed in Section 4. Some of the main issues which have been considered are as follows.
3.1 Cost vs Quality
Most areas are characterised by the phrase Pay now or Pay Later i.e. either a lot of time and effort is expended at the outset to achieve little or no maintenance, or minimum capital is spent, accepting that there will be regular on-going maintenance efforts and costs. For example, an intake structure can be an expensive but permanent concrete structure, or it can be a seasonal low-cost diversion weir which needs to be re-built every year.
3.2 Manufacturing Strategy
3.3 Maintenance Strategy
3.4 Rotor Design
3.5 Bearings
3.6 Drive train
3.7 Flow Regulation
3.8 Load Governing
3.9 End-Use Issues
Perhaps even more critical than the design of hydropower unit is how the power will actually be used.
3.9.1 Mechanical vs
electrical
Although the local viewpoint may often be in favour of
electricity generation as part of a new scheme, this may not be
the best use of the hydropower resource to meet local needs and
guarantee the success of a project. In most cases using the
majority of power for mechanical end-uses has proven to be more
cost-effective and sustainable; almost all of the 1000
micro-hydro schemes in Nepal operate one or more agricultural
machines. The key issues can be summarised as follows:
3.9.2 Charging and income-generation
3.9.3 Electrical generation
3.10 Areas for Development
The technology for village-scale hydropower is generally under-researched and could benefit from R&D in a number of fields, for example:
4. Proposed system designs
4.1 Overview
The preliminary designs proposed for the demonstration units, are as follows:
4.2 New Gharat Watermill Upgrade
Layout and
Upgradability
A principal aim behind the
proposed design is that millers should be offered a simple
concept, but one that can be upgraded. Therefore the layout of
the first demonstration units will continue to be vertical-shaft
systems, replacing the existing wooden construction, and used
primarily for milling in the traditional manner; the millstones,
mill-house and open chute can remain the same during the upgrade
process. However options for driving other machinery (either an
electrical generator or a rice-huller, spice-grinder, etc.) will
also be immediately possible by removing the top mill-stone and
replacing it with a single pulley and belt-drive. Further
sophistication can be achieved by replacing the open chute with a
penstock pipe and control valve. In the longer-term, greater
options can be opened up by using the same rotor but with a
horizontal axis and belt-driving two or more machines off the
main shaft in an enlarged mill-house.
Rotor design
The traditional wooden
rotor is less than 20% efficient. The steel runner design used in
Nepal is limited hydraulically to about 50% efficiency, and
contains two-dimensional curvature which requires laborious
fabricated manufacture. Efforts have therefore been made to
design a runner which can exceed 50% efficiency but have a
geometry suitable either for casting, or low-cost welded
fabrication. This would have major implications on its
suitability for both low-cost mass production, and for being
replicated at local-level. Casting also guarantees the quality of
the runner construction. Furthermore, this design of runner is
suitable for converting to a horizontal axis layout at a later
date.
Speed
Traditional watermills run at less than 100rpm. The Nepali design
increased the speed to around 150rpm, which was insufficient to
be able to attach a standard 1500rpm generator with a single
belt-drive, since 6:1 speed-increase is generally regarded as the
maximum. The proposed rotor design is intended to operate in the
region of 250-300rpm. This is an important advance in enabling
electricity generation, plus other faster-running agro-processing
machinery, to operate with a single belt-drive from the main
shaft.
Figure 1 shows a schematic of a simple new gharat upgrade, and Figure 2 illustrates the same runner used with a horizontal axis in multi-purpose mode.
4.3 Open Crossflow Multi-Purpose Schemes
The Multi-Purpose Unit will be appropriate where there is adequate head and flow to produce at least 5kW of power at the shaft. These projects will require considerably greater engineering and financial input than the simple mill upgrades. The key features of this unit must be robustness and very low maintenance. The competitive advantage of these Multi-Purpose Mills must be so marked that the enterprising millers that have set up diesel and electric mills, will want to get back into watermilling because it is cheaper and better than diesel.
The open crossflow design is recommended for a number of reasons: the crossflow turbine is well-disseminated through publications by SKAT and others; it can be replicated in modestly equipped workshops; and the open arrangement allows the technology to be more transparent and it is also significantly cheaper (and more efficient) without the casing. Furthermore the unit needs to have a horizontal axis because of the horizontal alignment of most end-use equipment and the desirability of avoiding twist belts wherever possible.
Figure 3 and Figure 4 illustrate the main elements and proposed layout of the multi-purpose design.
It is not proposed that the components for such a system should be manufactured in the remote areas, but that benchmark designs should be built at a centralised workshop, at least for the first batches. If village workshops wish to assemble or modify the units in the future, this should be encouraged. Small diesel engines are now assembled by hundreds of small workshops using components and spare parts supplied by larger companies in the regional centres. The original engines from which the designs were copied were long lasting and the same approach could be adopted with the manufacture of turbine components.
The overhung layout allows the wet components to be kept outside the mill building, with the bearings inside. It is important that the bearings and shaft are of adequate specification and that the overhung loads are kept as close to the bearings as possible. Running the end-use equipment off the main shaft is intended to keep the system compact, cheaper and safer to operate.
5. Conclusions and Implementation Strategy
The Watermills Block is addressing the immediate requirements of rural people by aiming to demonstrate the best technical solutions to meet their technical capabilities and economic needs. The technology must be both affordable and locally acceptable - technically and culturally. The history of small hydro shows that ignoring these factors has sometimes led to the transfer of efficient and powerful technologies which have had no chance of being replicated, maintained, or owned by local people, and have therefore been unsustainable unless propped up by foreign aid programmes.
The upgrading of traditional watermills is an effective and sustainable way of meeting the energy needs of a major section of the rural poor. Rather than attempting overly ambitious leaps in technology, the need for sustainability means starting at the current point of development and moving forward in steps that can be understood, afforded, and bring immediate and worthwhile benefit. There is a danger in adopting half-way solutions which are too simple to be reliable, but too sophisticated for local expertise to repair.
The danger with any Short Term Development Programme is that a lot of effort is put into establishing as many projects as possible within the time and budget allocated, without making provision for the long term training and backup. The Watermills programme is endeavouring to ensure that there will be groups of trained local engineers who are well-equipped to attend to problems as they occur. Gharat-owners will also need training (eg. via a local Association) to maintain their own mills.
If unwisely managed, one negative impact of watermills development can be anticipated (from experiences elsewhere) as occurring through market forces. If one watermill increases its business, other millers may suffer and come to resent the new technology. The Hilly Hydro Project is already taking active steps to prevent this problem by supporting the setting up of Watermill Associations, adding to the existing one in Chamoli. Groupings of local watermill owners in a valley or region will agree by consensus which mills to upgrade and what services should be provided so as to minimise any local conflicts of interest. Past experience [7] has shown that conflicts can be avoided by involving local people in the decision-making process and ensuring private purchase and ownership of the new technology.
There is also a danger of making the pilot projects too sophisticated, so that they are then too difficult to replicate. The project aims to keep the technology simple, robust and transparent, while providing appropriate levels of training and backup.
References:
1 Micro-hydropower in Nepal: development effects and future prospects with special reference to the heat generator, D.Jantzen, K.Koirala, FAKT, 1989
2 Engineering small waterpower schemes from traditional mills, R.Armstrong Evans, O.Paish, India Hilly Hydro Project - Brainstorming Conference, New Delhi, November 1995
3 Multi-purpose power unit with horizontal water turbine: operation and maintenance manual, A.Nakarmi, A.Bachmann, UNICEF/Nepal, 1984
4 Improved ghatta construction manual, Manfred Bach, GATE Publications, 1985
5 Performance testing of modified gharats in Kumaon region, R.Saini, N.Ahmed, Non-Conventional Energy Development Agency, Lucknow, U.P., 1989
6 Rural Technology Manual - improved water mill, A.Ahmad, CDRT, IERT, Allahabad, India, 1992
7 Key Factors for the Success of Village Hydro-Electric Programmes, N.P.A. Smith, World Renewable Energy Congress, 1994
|
Figure 1 : New Gharat, traditional layout |
|
Figure 2 New Gharat runner used in horizontal-axis, multi-purpose mode (plan view) |
|
Figure 3 : Open crossflow (elevation) |
|
Figure 4 : Open crossflow; general layout of horizontal shaft mill |